March 11, 2010

New York Lieutenant Governor Richard Ravitch Unveils Five Year Fiscal Reform Plan

On March 10, 2010 New York Lieutenant Governor Richard Ravitch released a fiscal reform plan which calls for a five-year plan to eliminate the State's structural imbalance and introduces a process by which annual budget balance is mandated, minitored and maintained. The plan calls for up to $2 billion in borrowing for the next three years and a financial review board consisting of five members, one each from the Assembly and the State Senate, two appointed by the Governor and one appointed by the New York State Comptroller.:

Ravitch Fiscal Reform Plan- Full Text


February 22, 2010

President Obama's Health Care Proposal

Summary

The President's health care proposal as released on February 22 purports to put "...American families and small business owners in control of their health care. To help those who are following this issue we are providing in this post, links to a 10+ page Summary prepared by the White House. This document provides a good overview and discussion regarding provisions in the proposed legislation.

SUMMARY

Exploring the Proposal

This is a link for those who want to really explore the President Obama's Health Care Proposal through more comprehensive Section by Section analysis .

Both of the above links will lead you to very useful information. We would urge everyone to explore these documents.

February 2, 2010

2011 Budget of the U.S. Government- Fact Sheets

As almost everyone knows, the 2011 U.S. Budget was submitted on February 1. Since this is such a huge budget, in terms of both bulk and scope, we have decided to limit this posting largely to links to some " Budget Fact Sheets" prepared by the Office of Management and Budget. Each separately linked fact sheet focuses on a particular priority or group of priorities related to this budget request, thus enabling you to quickly "pick and choose" those areas that interest and concern you without devoting considerable time to other parts of the budget. If you wish to examine this budget request in greater detail, go to the GPO Access link at the end of this posting.

Here are links to the Budget Fact Sheets::

Keeping America Safe and Secure

Clean Energy

Suppoting World Class Education for Children

Create Industries and Jobs

Secure and Affordable Health Care

Supporting America's Military Families

Supporting America's Middle Class Families

Supporting Our Nation's Seniors

Opening Doors for College and Opportunity

Those who are interested in more extensive regarding Budget for the U.S. Governmenrt for fy 11 can go to the GPO Access site at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/index.html and follow the various links at that location,


January 20, 2010

New York Governor David Paterson Presents Budget Proposal for Fiscal Year 2010-2011


Yesterday January 19, 2010 New York State Governor David Paterson proposed a 2010-11 Executive Budget that according to a Press Release from the Governor's Office "makes significant spending reductions in order to eliminate a $7.4 billion deficit and institutes key reforms to put New York on the road to economic and fiscal recovery. The Executive Budget proposal includes spending reductions across every area of the budget; limits State spending to far below both the Governor's proposed spending cap and the rate of inflation; implements the most significant public higher education reforms in a generation; and provides fiscal relief to local governments through an aggressive mandate reform agenda."

Below are links to some of the documents related to that proposal. Some of these documents are related primarily to the proposed State of New York Executive Budget as a whole while others include various agency presnetations, A link to State of New York Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman's commentary on the Governors observations regarding the judiciary part of the budget proposal is also included.

Link to Press Release , video presentation and various other documents related to Governors budget Address on January 19:

http://www.state.ny.us/governor/press/2010budgetaddress.html .

2010-2011 Governors Budget Proposal - Agency Presentations
http://publications.budget.state.ny.us/eBudget1011/agencyPresentations/pdf/AgencyPresentations.pdf

New York State Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman's Statemeont on Proposed 2010-11 Judiciary Budget
http://www.nycourts.gov/press/pr2010_01.shtml

January 11, 2010

Letter to OMB Director Peter Orszag from New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg

The following is from a letter sent by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg to OMB Director Peter Orszag requesting full federal funding to reimburse the City for security costs associated with Terrorism Trials to be held in Manhattan.

January 5, 2010
The Honorable Peter R. Orszag
Director
Office of Management and Budget
725 17th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20503

Dear Director Orszag,

As you are well aware, the suspected perpetrators of the worst terrorist attack on U.S. soil
will soon be brought to New York City to face criminal prosecution. The City of New York will
provide the security necessary to ensure public safety, not only while the suspects are on trial, but throughout the entire time the suspects are detained in New York City.

I want to express my strong support of Senator Charles E. Schumer's proposal that
President Obama include a separate line in the upcoming Fiscal Year 2011 budget that devotes
federal funding to reimburse the NYPD and other local law enforcement for the full costs of
providing security for the upcoming trials.

The City of New York's financial resources are in short supply, and we have been forced
to reduce our Police Department's headcount. Thus, securing the trial will require us to pull
existing personnel from crime prevention efforts around the City and require significant overtime
expenses. As 9/11 was an attack on the entire nation, we need the federal government to shoulder the significant costs we will incur and ease this burden.

We estimate the cost for security operations will be approximately $216 million for the
first year and $206 million annually in subsequent years. This includes personnel costs of more
than $200 million annually and equipment costs of $12.5 million in the first year and $2.5 million
in subsequent years. We have shared our security plans and estimated costs with the Justice
Department as we work with our federal partners to prepare for the trials.

I want to assure you that our estimates, while significant, are real and not the result of any
expectation that we will receive a "blank check." For the sake of comparison, the cost of policing the Republican National Convention in 2004 was $50 million and that event was less than a week long. The security arrangements for the incarceration and trial periods will be need to be in place around the clock over a period of years....

November 24, 2009

The Continuing Quest for Health Care Reform in the U.S.

Updated to November 25, 2009

Over the past months we have posted a variety of items related to the quest for health care reform in the United States. See our last posting at "Health Care Update as of the Beginning of October 2009. The quest continues. During the last month the House of Representatives passed HR 3962(Affordable Health Care for America Act) on November 7 and the Senate has at least agreed to begin debate on their bill HR3590 (Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act) on November 21.. Given the historical record of attempts at health care reform these are remarkable achievements but we still do not know if the end is in sight.

Rather than engage in extended discussion on this posting we will concentrate identifying selected documents related to the two bills mentioned above and close by mentioning a few recent news articles of interest. First the documents:

Selected Documents Related to HR 3962 - "Affordable Health Care for America Act":

Final Roll Call for HR 3962

Revenue Effects of HR 3962

Press Release: House Makes History on Health Reform

Abortion Amendment

Selected Documents Related to HR 3590 - "Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act"

:Detailed Summary of HR 3590

Statement of Administration Policy Regarding HR 3590

CBO Score: Top-Line Facts According to the Heritage Foundation. Senate bill. 3950

Senate Roll Call vote for HR 3590 on 11/21/2009 at 7:55PM

Other Sources:

Op-Ed Contributor
False Alarm on Abortion
By PHILLIP B. LEVINE
Published New York Times: November 25, 2009
What is being overlooked in the abortion debate is the other benefits that expanded health insurance coverage could bring to women’s reproductive health.

Budget Hawks Have a Buffet of Options With Health Bill
By DAVID LEONHARDT
Published New York Times: November 25, 2009
Senators who say theyre serious about reducing health care costs have plenty of opportunities in the current bills to fulfill their goals

Published New York Times: November 19, 2009 Key Differences in the Health Care Plans
The health care proposals from the House and the Senate are broadly similar but differ on some major issues. Click here to see a more detailed comparison of the two plans.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2009/11/19/us/politics/1119-plan-differences.html

Senate Says Health Plan Will Cover Another 31 Million
By ROBERT PEAR and DAVID M. HERSZENHORN
Published New York Times: November 19, 2009
Senator Harry Reid put forward his version of the health care overhaul, promising it would reduce the deficit while covering most of the uninsured.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/19/health/policy/19health.html

Selected Recent Editorials from New York Times regarding health care reform.

Where two contentious issues intersect: Immigration and health House measure omits Senate panel's legal test (David Montgomery) Washington Post Nov 16.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/15/AR2009111502625.html?wpisrc=newsletter&wpisrc=newsletter

A Milestone in the Health Care Journey, By Ronald Brownstein. An essay published on the Atlantic website,, November 21, 2009


November 12, 2009

Congressional Printing: Background and Issues for Congress

A Report from the Congressional Research Service (CRS) prepared by R. Eric Petersen, Analyst in American National Government November 5, 2009.*

Summary

Periodically, concerns have been raised about the number and variety of products created to
document congressional activity. Other concerns focus on the process for authorizing and
distributing printed government documents to Members of Congress, committees, and other
officials in the House and Senate. These concerns reflect broader issues related to the manner in which government and private information is created, assembled, distributed, and preserved in
light of the emergence of electronic publishing and distribution.

From its establishment in 1861, the Government Printing Office (GPO) has compiled, formatted,
printed, bound, and distributed documents that have recorded the activities of Congress (and the
work of other governmental entities). In current practice, more than half of all government
documents originate in digital form, and are distributed electronically. As a consequence of
electronic production and dissemination, some congressional materials are now more readily
available to wider congressional, governmental, and public audiences than when they were only
produced and distributed in paper form.

Some have argued that eliminating paper versions of some congressional documents, and relying instead on electronic versions, could result in further cost and resource savings and might provide environmental benefits. At the same time, however, current law regarding document production, authentication, and preservation, as well as some user demand, require a number of paper-based documents to be produced and distributed as part of the official record of congressional proceedings.

As a result of requirements for both electronic and paper-based versions of congressional
documents, GPO oversees an information distribution process that produces and distributes most of the congressional information for which it is responsible in both electronic and printed forms. This process provides the necessary information and appropriate formats for Congress to carry out and document its activities, but it may also result in some unwanted printed copies of
congressional documents being delivered to congressional users who prefer to access those
resources electronically. More broadly, the transition to electronic distribution of materials may
raise questions about the capacity of current law and congressional practices to effectively
oversee GPO’s management and distribution responsibilities regarding congressional
information.

This report, which will be updated as events warrant, provides an overview and analysis of issues
related to the processing and distribution of congressional information by the Government
Printing Office. Subsequent sections address several issues, including funding congressional
printing, printing authorizations, current printing practices, and options for Congress. Finally, the
report provides congressional printing appropriations, production, and distribution data in a
number of tables.

Click here to see the complete Report
_____________________________________
* Thanks to Rick McKinney, Federal Reserve Board Library and Janet Fischer of the Golden Gate University Law Library for forwarding information about this Report..

October 6, 2009

Health Care Update as of the Beginning of October 2009

Through various means, both web based and print, we are monitoring as best we can discussions related to the ongoing health care discussions. Below is an edited and excerpted version of some information we received recently from GalleryWatch in Washington, DC. We would like to share it with you. This updates our earlier posting on the Criminal Law Library Blog
____________________________

You might have noticed over the past little while that the Senate Finance Committee has been marking up a bill to reform our health care system.( see links following this discussion to the October 1 version of the bill from the Finance Committee and to a list dated October 5, 2009 of technical corrections to that bill).

This week,[last of September and beginning of October 2009] the last regular committee markup session on health care reform legislation wound down in the Senate Finance Committee. A conceptual draft proposal offered by Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) was amended with over 40 changes as of Thursday evening. CongressNow reported Thursday that the committee adopted an amendment offered by Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) that creates optional state-level public insurance plans.

The committee started its session with more than 500 possible amendments and considered over 100 amendments. There were reports Tuesday on the adopted amendments from last week's sessions and the committee defeated proposals to add a public insurance option offered by Sens. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) and Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) on Tuesday afternoon. Roll Call reported Wednesday morning that Rockefeller and Schumer are optimistic about the chance of new amendments on a public insurance option on the Senate floor.

On Wednesday, the committee rejected several amendments (view first and second amendments) restricting abortion coverage offered by Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and another amendment requiring identity verification offered by ranking member Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa). Also on Wednesday the committee adopted an amendment by Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) that allows senior citizens to deduct health expenses. CongressNow also reported Wednesday on Democratic efforts to tweak the tax treatment of high-end insurance plans.

TEXT OF AMERICA'S HEALTH FUTURE ACT OF 2009, AS AMENDED 10-02-09

TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO AMERICA'S HEALTH FUTURE ACT OF 2009, OCTOBER 5, 2009.

As Gallerywatch also notes: "With all the activity by the Senate Finance Committee, don’t forget about the two other health care bills out there, HR 3200 from the House and the Senate HELP Committee’s bill S 1679, named in honor of the late Senator Kennedy"

August 27, 2009

New York City: Special Event Permit Application Information

People often ask about procedures for obtaining approval to staging secial events in the City, especially those involving some form of street activity. New York City requires that a "Special Event Permit Application be submitted to the City of New York Street Activity Permit Office prior to any special event involving street activity held in the City. Depending on the type of event planned, other City agencies may also require approval. The below information includes a list of Application Sponsor Rules and Responsibilities, Support Permit Requirements, and a link to the City of New York Special Permit Application form:

APPLICANT/SPONSOR RULES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

IT IS THE APPLICANT’S/SPONSOR’S RESPONSIBILITY TO:
􀂃
MAINTAIN ONE LANE ON EVERY STREET FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES.
􀂃
KEEP ALL FIRE HYDRANTS AND ALARM BOXES FREE OF OBSTRUCTION.
􀂃
SUBMIT EVIDENCE OF INSURANCE PRIOR TO FINAL PERMIT APPROVAL. PLEASE PROVIDE A CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE WHICH NAMES THE CITY OF NEW YORK AS AN ADDITIONAL INSURED AND SHOWS A MINIMUM OF $1MILLION IN COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE AND A POLICY ENDORSEMENT WHICH INDEMNIFIES AND HOLDS HARMLESS THE CITY OF NEW YORK.
􀂃
PLEASE NOTIFY THE COMMUNITY OF THE EVENT BY POSTING “INFORMATIONAL” SIGNS 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CLOSURE OF THE STREET OR USE OF PARKING (THESE SIGNS WILL BE ISSUED WITH YOUR PERMIT). AND CONFIRM WITH THE NYPD THE POSTING OF “NO PARKING SIGNS” FOR ENFORCEMENT AND TOWING.


SUPPORT PERMIT REQUIREMENTS

PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL COMPONENTS OF THE EVENT ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE STREET ACTIVITY PERMIT OFFICE AND MAY REQUIRE APPROVAL BY AND/OR PERMITS FROM OTHER CITY AGENCIES. THE STREET ACTIVITY PERMIT OFFICE APPROVAL DOES NOT CONSTITUTE PERMISSION FROM OTHER AGENCIES. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT/SPONSOR TO SECURE ALL NECESSARY CITY OF NEW YORK PERMITS AND PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION TO THE STREET ACTIVITY PERMIT OFFICE PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE.

CITY OF NEW YORK SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM

August 18, 2009

Report: Investigation of the Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor

As has been widely reported in the news media, the State of New York Office of the Inspector General has just released its Report and Investigation of the Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor. This is a Report grew out of a complaint of alleged misconduct on the part of officials of the Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor that was referred to the Inspector General's Office on May 7, 2007 by then-Governor Spitzer. The Waterfront Commission is a bi-state entity established in 1953 by the United States Congress to investigate, deter, combat and remedy criminal activity and influence in the Port of New York and New Jersey, and to ensure fair hiring practices. Report findings include discussion and and enumeration of a number of abuses and irregularities identified by the staff of the Office of the Inspector General during their investigation of the Commission. To see the entire Report click on the link below:

Report: Investigation of the Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor. August 2009.

June 11, 2009

New York City Bar Report on the Bronx Supreme and Criminal Courts

The Association of the Bar of the City of New York (New York City Bar) has just published its Report on the Merger of the Bronx Supreme and Criminal Courts. Commenting on the Report in his June 11, 2009 New York Law Journal article, "City Bar Report Cites 'Serious Problems' With Bronx Merger", Daniel Wise writes: "The merger of Criminal and Supreme courts in the Bronx has created 'serious problems' if additional judicial resources are not made available, a report by the New York City Bar Concluded." In the Report it is recommended that "strong and immediate attempts" need to be taken to handle a growing backlog of felony cases.

The New York City Bar report was prepared by the Committee on Criminal Courts and the Committee on Criminal Justice Operations, both committees of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York and released on June 10, 2009. Below is an excerpt from the Opening Statement and a link to the complete report:

Opening Statement Excerpt:
In early 2004, Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye announced that the Supreme and Criminal Courts in Bronx County would be merged to create a new Criminal Division to handle all misdemeanor and felony cases.1 This judicial experiment was implemented in November, 2004. Prior to this, in New York Citys criminal justice system all post-indictment felony cases were prosecuted exclusively in the Supreme Court, and all misdemeanor cases were prosecuted exclusively in the Criminal Court of the City of New York. The stated purpose of Merger was: to promote the administration of justice in the criminal courts in Bronx County by authorizing deployment of the judges of those courts in a manner that assures that all present and future caseload demands in such county will be met as expeditiously as possible.

It was generally acknowledged prior to Merger that because of the overwhelming crush of misdemeanor cases filed annually, the Criminal Court of the City of New York was staggering under an insurmountable misdemeanor trial calendar. For example, in 2003, the last full year before Merger, out of more than 40,000 misdemeanor complaints filed in Bronx County Criminal Court, only 191 misdemeanor cases were tried. While the problem was not unique to Bronx County, the Bronx was chosen to serve as the judicial Petri dish for the purpose of determining whether Merger, if successful, should be extended to the other counties of New York City as well.

Merger has now been in effect for almost five years and it appears that while the program has reduced the backlog in misdemeanor trials it has had the unintended consequence of creating a far greater backlog in felony trials. This report will evaluate the stated goals of the Merger against an analysis of its actual results. It will address a statistical analysis of caseloads prior to and after Merger, the practical effects of implementing Merger, its future prospects, and a conclusion as to its effectiveness and potential expansion to other jurisdictions. This report is based upon statistics from the Office of Court Administration, and extensive interviews of members of the judiciary, prosecutors and criminal defense attorneys.

New York City Bar Report on the Merger of the Bronx Supreme and Criminal Courts

June 1, 2009

Cybersecurity: Reviews and Iniatives of the Obama Administration

Web based criminal justice issues cannot be addressed in a rational manner without also the establishment and ongoing maintenance of a trusted and resilient information and communications infrastructure. Realizing the paramount importance of these objectives the Obama administration has been engaging in a mumber related activities including President Obama's recent call for the creation of a cybersecurity coordinator who will orchestrate and integrate federal cybersecurity policies and agendas, and the release by the White House of a Report: Cyberspace Policy Review: Assuring a Trusted and Resilient Information Infrasturcture

These measures could not be more timely. The increasing rate that information on the web is being compromised in many ways including identity theft, willful distortion of information,and illegal wiretapping to name a few. Other organizations such as the American Association of Law Libraries (AALL) have long been concerned with issues related to the continuing integrity or authenticity of information on the web and are actively engaged in developing recommendations and helping others understand the importance of achieving and maintaining information authenticity of the web but additional help and support is needed. It is therefore most encouraging to see indications that the Obama administration is interested in taking an active role in addressing these and related issues.

The following are links to documents and articles discussing recent cybersecurity initiatives of the Obama administration.

DOCUMENTS:

Fact Sheet Prepared byWhite House: Cyberspace Policy Review: Assuring a Trusted and Resilient Information and Communications Infrastructure

Report Released by White House: Cyberspace Policy Review, Assuring a Trusted and Resilient Information and Communications Infrastructure

ARTICLES:

Cybersecurity Review Finds U.S. Networks 'Not Secure'
The report dovetails with President Obama's call for the creation of a cybersecurity coordinator who will orchestrate and integrate federal cybersecurity policies and agendas. InformationWeek Daily Newsletter June 1, 2009.

Reaction toObama speech and 60-day report is widely positive Several senior lawmakers on Friday applauded President Barack Obama’s plans to improve cybersecurity. Federal Computer Week Daily June 1, 2009 Includes highlights of some inital reactions by members of congress.

Obama Announces White House Cybersecurity Position InformationWeek Daily Newsletter June 1

Obama Action Plan Calls for Cybersecurity Coordinator
By William Jackson
May 29, 2009
Federa; Computer Week June 1, 2009.
New White House post will anchor a suite of initiatives declaring that, “the status quo no longer is acceptable, we can and must do better,” President Barack Obama today announced creation of the position of a cybersecurity coordinator who will direct national cybersecurity policy from the White House. Federal Computer Week June 1, 2009


May 27, 2009

Judge Sonia Sotomayor: Background Documents, LC Materials, Two Opinions, And Completed Questionnaire

To help those who are interested in information beyond that available in the popular news media regarding Judge Sotomayor we have assembeled two background documents, two of Judge Sotomayor's opinions, one from 2002 and another from 2008. Also included is a completed copy of the questionnaire of Judge Sotoamyor prepared for and delivered to the Senate Judiciary Committee. All judicial candidates such as Sonia Sotomayor are required to complete and submit a questionnaire as part of the confirmation process. You can view these documents from the links below. The links contain brief title descriptions of the respective materials:

Background on Judge Sonie Sotomayor Prepared by the White House, May 2009

Vote Summary on the Nomination of
Sonia Sotomayor to be a U.S. Circuit Judge for the Second Circuit, Compiled Oct 2, 1998

Opinion Decided by Judge Sotomayor in Matter of Pappas v. Giuliani, May 13, 2002

Opinion Decided by Judge Sotomayor in the Matter of Ricci v. DeStefano, June 9, 2008

Completed Questionnaire of U.S. Supreme Court nominee Hon. Sonia Sotomayor as submiteed to th Committee of the Judiciary of the U.S. Senate on Thursday June 4, 2009/

In addition to the above documents The Law Library of Congress has launched a new resource on U.S.Supreme Court Nominee Sonia Sotomayor at http://www.loc.gov/law/find/sotomayor.php. The site contains information on articles and books by Sotomayor, Congressional documents, cases, and web resources.

May 19, 2009

Pruning Prisons: How Cutting Corrections Can Save Money and Protect Public Safety

The Justice Policy Institute, an advocacy organization based in Washington DC, has just issued a report, Pruning Prisons: How Cutting Corrections Can Save Money and Protect Public Safety, which argues that states can improve public safety and save millions of dollars by investing in community based alternatives to incarceration. Quoting from the Introduction: "as the United States grapples with harsh economic realities, states and localities continue to cut budgets, shed jobs, and trim institutions that are not cost effective. Among the least cost effective are prisons and jail systems. Bulding on these observations the remainder of the of the report outlines a number of findings and recommendations supported by charts and other data .

More from the Introduction:

The United States’ prison system continues to grow every year. Over 2.3 million
people are incarcerated in U.S. prisons and jails. As state prisons hold nearly 60
percent of the people incarcerated, yearly increases in the prison system are most
keenly felt by states.

The United States spends billions of dollars on incarceration each year. Over the last
10 years the average yearly increase of state spending on corrections has been
approximately 3 percent. If such trends continue, states would be expected to spend
more than $50 billion on corrections per year by 2010.2

Increasing the availability of parole could save government agencies millions of dollars.
State and federal agencies would save roughly $3 billion dollars per year if they reduced
the prison population by 10 percent by moving individuals into the parole system.
Improving parole services and supports could save states millions of dollars.
Approximately 26 percent of people on parole in 2007 returned to prison for a
technical violation. By shifting the modality of supervision to one of support and
service, states could send fewer people back to prison for technical violations. If
states returned only half as many people to prison for technical violations, the justice
system could save approximately $1.1 billion.

Substance abuse treatment provided in the community is more cost-effective than
imprisonment. Substance-involved people have come to compose a large portion of
the prison population and substance use may play a role in the commission of certain
crimes. Approximately 16 percent of people in state prison and 18 percent of people
in federal prison reported committing their crimes to obtain money for drugs.
Treatment delivered in the community is one of the most cost-effective ways to
prevent such crimes and costs approximately $20,000 less than incarceration per
person per year.

To see the entire report click on the link below:

Complete Report: Pruning Prisons...

May 14, 2009

Report of New York State Inspector General Investigating Allegations Related to the NY Commission on Public Integrity

A Report of the New York State Inspector General, Joseph Fisch, released on May 13, 2009 concluded that Herbert Titelbaum Executive Director of the New York State Council on Public Integrity and a close friend exchanged at least 165 phone calls and held regular dinners over a five month period in 2007, during which Mr. Titelbaum disclosed the progress and details of the inquiry conducted by the panel, the Commission on Public Integrity, into the handling by former governor Spitzer's administration of the travel records of longtime Senate majority leader Joseph L. Bruno. Since the Report was released there have been calls for the resignation of Mr. Titelbaum

Below are links to two news articles which discuss the Report and its implications, followed by links to the Executive Summary and Findings of the Report, ending with a link to the complete Report itself:

New York Times Article May 13, 2009 "Paterson Asks Ethics Panel to Quit by Danny Hakim.

New York Law Journal article: "Inspector General, Governor Call for Integrity Head to Resign" by Joel Stashenko May 14, 2009.

Executive Summary and Findings of Report of State of New York Office of the Inspector General Regarding the Investigation of Certain Allegations Related to the New York State Office of Public Integrity: May 13, 2009.

Report of State of New York Office of the Inspector General Regarding the Investigation of Certain Allegations Related to the New York State Office of Public Integrity: May 13, 2009. Full Report:

May 12, 2009

New York State: Commission on Judical Conduct Annual Report 2009

Pursuant to Section 42, paragraph 4, of the Judiciary Law of the State of New York the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct respectfully submits the Annual Report 2009 of its activities covering the period from January 1 through December 31, 2008.

The New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct is the state agency responsible for investigating complaints of misconduct against judges of the state unified court system and, where appropriate, determining to admonish, censure or remove from office those judges found to have engaged in unethical behavior. All determinations are subject to review in the Court of Appeals, New York State's highest court.

New York State. Commissdion on Judicial Conduct, Annual Report 2009

Note: The document is large and may take up to half a minute to open, depending on your computer and Internet connection speeds.

Press Release accompanying 2009 Annual Report

April 28, 2009

Key Facts and Commentary About Swine Influenza (Swine Flu)

As you undoubtedly have heard, a new strain of influenza called Swine Flu or Swine Influenza apparently started about a month ago in Mexico. It has now spread, first to at least a few states in the United States and now may be spreading world wide.

Art Bernardino who provides consulting services in pandamic planning suggests seven things people can do to lessen infection and protect themselves and others:

1. Wash hands frequently using soap and water or waterless hand sanitizers

2. Cover your cough and sneezes use proper cough etiquette by coughing into the crook of your elbow

3. Minimize contact with others. Crowded places and large gatherings of people should be avoided.

4. Maintain a distance of at least 6 feet between persons wherever practical

5. If you have to be in close contact (less than 6 feet) with people, consider wearing a N95 (NIOSH approved) respirator

6. Keep the flu out of the workplace! Don't go to work or allow people to come to work if they are possibly sick with the flu

7. Avoid touching the eyes, nose and mouthThe best source for current information on the Swine Flu and recommended responses are at the following two websites:

To help provide added perspective regarding this Swine Flu issue I am posting links to a Q & A explanation of Swine Flu, an unedited transcript to a CDC sponsored conference call regarding the issue, and a link to a CDC website devoted to the issue of Swine Flu::

Q&A: Key Facts About Swine Flu

Unedited Transcript: CDC Conference Call Regarding Swine Flu, April 27, 2009

New CDC Website Devoted to the Issues of Swine Flu

April 28, 2009

Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania Announces Switch to Democratic Party

Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, a Republican since 1966, said on Tuesday April 28 that he will switch to the Decmocratic Party and will run as a Democrat in 2010, thus presenting Democrats with a possible 60th vote and the power to break Senate filibusters.

Here is a link to Senator Specter's statement made earlier today 4-28-09


April 22, 2009

Legal Memoranda and Commentary On Issues Related to Interrogation and Torture

In response to litigation brought by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the Obama administration authorized the Justice Department to release four secret legal memoranda used by the Bush administration to justify torture. The memoranda were releasd on April 16, 2009. President Obama also issued a statement, emphasizing that "this is a time of reflection, not retribution".

Ali Soufan, a former FBI agent who was involved in the interrogations being discussed and who questioned Abu Zubaydah in 2002 has written an important Op Ed article, "My Tortured Decision", which is published in the April 23, 2009 New York Times. In his article Mr. Soufan says trhat Abu Zubaydah provided important intelligence under traditional methods. He writes: "...I questioned him [Zubaydah] from March to June 2002, before the harsh techniques were introduced late in August. Under traditional interrogation methods, he provided us with important actionable intelligence". Mr. Soufan also writes that he believes that it was the "right decision" to release the memos because "we need the truth to come out" and that releaseing these memos "enables us to begin the tricky business of finally bringing these terrorists to justice".

Since the events being discussed transpired during the administration of George W. Bush, we thought it might be interesting and instructive to also provide a link to: Reigning in the Imperial Presidency, Lessons and Recommendations Relating to the Presidency of George W. Bush.; a report prepared by the majority staff of the U.S. House Judiciary Committee.

April 8, 2009

New York District Attorney Morgenthau Announces 118 Count Indictment of Profileration of Illicit Missle and Nuclear Technology to Government of Iran

Manhattan District Attorney Robert M. Morgenthau announced today a 118-count
indictment of a Chinese citizen and his company for charges relating to the
misuse of Manhattan banks and the proliferation of illicit missile and nuclear
technology to the Government of Iran. The Chinese company, known as LIMMT,
is a major supplier of banned weapons material to the Iranian military.

The defendants, LI FANG WEI (a/k/a KARL LEE, a/k/a PATRIC, a/k/a SUNNY
BAI, a/k/a K. LEE a/k/a KL, a/k/a DAVID LI, a/k/a F.W. LI) and LIMMT
ECONOMIC AND TRADE COMPANY, LTD., (a/k/a LIMMT (DALIAN FTZ)
METALLURGY AND MINERALS CO., LTD., a/k/a LIMMT (DALIAN FTZ)
MINMETALS AND METALLURGY CO., LTD., a/k/a LIMMT (DALIAN FTZ)
METALLURGY AND MINERALS CO., LTD., a/k/a ANSI METALLURGY
INDUSTRY CO. LTD., a/k/a BLUE SKY INDUSTRY CORPORATION, a/k/a SC
(DALIAN) INDUSTRY & TRADE CO., LTD., a/k/a SINO METALLURGY AND
MINMETALS INDUSTRY CO., LTD., a/k/a SUMMIT INDUSTRY
CORPORATION, a/k/a LIAONING INDUSTRY & TRADE CO., LTD., a/k/a
WEALTHY OCEAN ENTERPRISES LTD.) (LIMMT) were indicted on charges of
falsifying business records and conspiracy.

Morgenthau Indictment, Li Fang Wei et.al.