Criminal Law Library BlogOctober 16, 2026 – Cost Estimate.
As ordered reported by the House Committee on Energy and Commerce on September 16, 2026
Articles Posted in Legal News and Views
The Future of Social Security: Understanding the 2026 Long Term Projections
Introduction
Social Security’s long term financial outlook has again moved to the forefront with the release of the Congressional Budget Office’s 2026 long term projections and the Social Security Trustees’ latest annual assessment. Although the reports differ in methodology and some of their estimates, they point to the same fundamental challenge: under current law, the gap between Social Security’s scheduled benefits and the revenues available to finance them is projected to persist and generally widen over the decades ahead. This article examines the findings of CBO and the Trustees, supplemented by analysis from J.P. Morgan Asset Management, with particular attention to the projected depletion of trust fund reserves, the distinction between scheduled and payable benefits, the demographic and economic forces contributing to the financing gap, and what these projections actually mean, and do not mean, for the future of Social Security.
CBO’s 2026 Long Term Projections for Social Security
Legal AI Without Borders: Lexroom Takes on Europe
Europe’s legal artificial intelligence market may be entering a new stage of development. Italian legal AI provider Lexroom has made its first acquisitions, purchasing France based Query Juriste and Bulgaria based Praven Intelekt. The transactions extend Lexroom’s operations into five European countries and illustrate one possible strategy for building legal AI systems across jurisdictions whose laws, legal sources, languages, and professional practices differ substantially.
The acquisitions were announced on September 8, 2026. Artificial Lawyer characterized them as Lexroom’s first expansion through acquisitions, following its earlier organic entry into Germany and Spain. Together with its home market of Italy, the additions of France and Bulgaria give the company a presence in five European legal markets.
The developments also offer a useful window into the evolution of legal AI beyond the United States, particularly in a European market where technology increasingly crosses borders while law and authoritative legal information remain strongly jurisdiction specific.
No Unanimous Answer: Closing Arguments and Criminal Responsibility in the Lindsay Clancy Trial
Introduction
The closely watched Massachusetts murder trial of Lindsay Clancy ended on September 4, 2026, not with a verdict, but with a mistrial after jurors reported that they could not reach unanimous agreement. The result leaves unresolved one of the most difficult questions presented to a criminal jury: when severe mental illness is established, at what point does that illness eliminate criminal responsibility for otherwise intentional acts?
Clancy was charged in connection with the January 24, 2023 deaths of her three children, Cora, Dawson, and Callan Clancy, at the family’s home in Duxbury, Massachusetts. At trial, the central dispute was not whether Clancy had caused the children’s deaths. Instead, the case largely turned on her mental condition and whether the Commonwealth proved that she was criminally responsible when the killings occurred.
Confessions, Confidentiality, and Child Protection: Questions at the Intersection of Law and Religion
Opening Statement
This essay does not advocate a predetermined legal or religious outcome. Its purpose is to examine, as fairly and carefully as possible, the competing arguments surrounding proposals to create a child-abuse exception to the clergy-penitent privilege or sacramental seal of confession. The protection of children, the preservation of religious liberty, the responsibilities of clergy, and the practical consequences of mandatory-reporting laws all deserve serious consideration. After reviewing these perspectives, readers should be left to decide how, or whether, these important interests can be reconciled.¹
Introduction: A Difficult Intersection of Law, Religion, and Child Protection
ABA Criminal Justice Section Update: July 2026
CJS: Chair Melba Pearson’s celebration of the Criminal Justice Section
We started this term needing to make real choices about our budget. We made cuts. We didn’t get to do everything we wanted to do this year, and I won’t pretend otherwise. But we close this term with a balanced budget and a Section that is genuinely better off than the one that I inherited. Building off the hard work of past Chairs Tina Luongo and Sidney Butcher, that discipline is something I’m proud to hand to the next Chair. And even with those constraints, our programming grew, our resolutions grew; Committee participation is up across the board. That is the real health of this section.
Why Kurt Godel’s Warning Should Matter Today
I have chosen to write about this remarkably rich topic because it sits at the intersection of constitutional law, political theory, logic, and history, precisely the kind of issue that invites thoughtful discussion among lawyers, judges, scholars, and legal information professionals.
Although Kurt Gödel never publicly explained the precise “proof” he believed he had discovered, scholars, constitutional theorists, historians, and legal commentators have spent decades trying to reconstruct what he meant when he warned that the U.S. Constitution could legally evolve into a dictatorship.
The story itself is well documented. While preparing for his U.S. citizenship examination in 1947, Gödel intensely studied American constitutional law. According to his friend Oskar Morgenstern, Gödel became alarmed after concluding that there was an “inner contradiction” in the Constitution that could permit a democratic republic to transform legally into an authoritarian regime.
From Bucket List to Agentic AI: Inside the April/May Issue of Experience Magazine
OVERVIEW:
The April/May 2026 issue of the American Bar Association Senior Lawyers Division’s Experience Magazine (Volume 36, Issue 3) centers on a unifying and reflective theme: the meaning of the “bucket list” at different stages of life and professional maturity. The issue combines personal essays, reflections on retirement and reinvention, practical professional guidance, and a timely discussion of artificial intelligence in legal practice.
A major theme running throughout the issue is that fulfillment in later life is not necessarily tied to grand adventures or dramatic achievements, but often to purpose, service, mentoring, and appreciation for experiences already gained. Several contributors challenge the traditional notion of a “bucket list” as merely a checklist of destinations or accomplishments. Instead, they encourage readers—particularly senior lawyers—to think about meaning, contribution, relationships, and continued intellectual engagement.
The Boundaries of Executive Clemency: Legal Limits on the Presidential Pardon Power
The President’s clemency authority is among the most expansive powers granted under the U.S. Constitution. Rooted directly in the constitutional text, the power to grant reprieves and pardons has long been understood as broad, flexible, and largely insulated from judicial or legislative interference. Yet, as both historical practice and Supreme Court precedent make clear, the pardon power is not without meaningful limits. For legal researchers, practitioners, and law librarians, understanding these boundaries is essential to placing executive clemency within its proper constitutional and institutional context.
At its core, the pardon power extends only to “offenses against the United States,” meaning federal crimes. This jurisdictional limitation is fundamental. A presidential pardon cannot reach state prosecutions or convictions, which remain within the authority of state governors or other state level clemency bodies. In an era where parallel federal and state investigations are increasingly common, this distinction has taken on renewed practical importance.
The Constitution also draws a clear textual boundary in cases of impeachment. While a president may pardon individuals for federal criminal offenses, that authority cannot be used to halt or undo impeachment proceedings initiated by the House of Representatives or judgments rendered by the Senate. This exception reflects the Framers’ intent to preserve Congress’s role as a check on executive misconduct, ensuring that the pardon power cannot be deployed as a shield against political accountability.
Digital Afterlife: Why Your Online Accounts Deserve a Place in Your Estate Plan
In a digital age where much of our financial, personal, and professional lives exist online, an often overlooked question arises: what happens to those digital assets when we die? In a recent article, “What Happens to Your Online Accounts When You Die—And How to Make Sure Your Family Isn’t Left Scrambling,” Adam H. Douglas, writing for The Epoch Times (April 16, 2026), explores the growing importance of digital estate planning and offers practical steps to ensure loved ones are not left navigating a maze of inaccessible accounts and unresolved obligations.
Read the full article here: What Happens to Your Online Accounts When You Die—And How to Make Sure Your Family Isn’t Left Scrambling