Articles Posted in criminal behavior

by

As law enforcement agencies confront growing volumes of digital information and increasingly complex investigations, the challenge is no longer simply gathering data,  it is connecting the right information quickly enough to generate actionable intelligence. This upcoming webinar explores how agencies are responding by moving toward more integrated and collaborative investigative environments that improve visibility, coordination, and analytical capability across systems and jurisdictions.

Drawing on real-world operational examples and practitioner insights, the discussion will examine where investigations most commonly stall in fragmented data environments and how connected systems can help investigators identify leads, uncover relationships, and develop cases more efficiently. Panelists will also explore how agencies are leveraging integrated workflows and analytics to accelerate “speed to intelligence” while minimizing additional complexity for investigators already working under demanding conditions.

Among the key issues to be addressed are:

Continue reading

by

Effective policing often begins long before an officer steps out of the vehicle. As highlighted in this Policing Matters Patrol Week feature, the patrol car serves as a mobile decision-making hub—where information is processed, risks are evaluated, and critical judgments are made in real time. Drawing on the experience of Sgt. John Banner of the White Settlement, Texas Police Department, a 2026 Texas Law Enforcement Achievement Award for Valor recipient, the below information offers a practical and compelling look at how preparation, situational awareness, and disciplined habits shape outcomes in high-pressure encounters.

FROM: Police1 Roll Call, Sara Calms, Senior Editor, (April 22, 2026).

 

 

by

As artificial intelligence rapidly enters the criminal justice system (shaping everything from policing strategies to judicial decision-making) the need for clear guidance has become increasingly urgent. Two recent publications from the Council on Criminal Justice provide a timely and authoritative response:

Continue reading

by

Two recent opinion columns published on Justia Verdict – Legal Analysis and Commentary from Justia examine the legal, political, and moral implications of the continuing disclosures surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein investigations. Written by Professor Marci A. Hamilton of the University of Pennsylvania and founder of CHILD USA, the essays present a forceful argument that accountability for systemic abuse requires sustained legal pressure and public transparency. The views expressed are those of the author and do not represent the official position of Justia.

1. “The Three Avenues to Justice in the Epstein Cases” (Feb. 24, 2026)

In The Three Avenues to Justice in the Epstein Cases, Professor Hamilton argues that meaningful accountability is likely to emerge through three principal legal pathways rather than through federal prosecutorial initiative alone.

Continue reading

by

In recent years, advances in neuroscience have sparked interest in whether brain stimulation technologies might contribute to crime prevention. Techniques such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) have been studied for their effects on impulse control, aggression, and moral decision-making traits often associated with criminal behavior. While this research is scientifically intriguing, its relevance to criminal justice policy remains limited and contested.

The Neuroscience Rationale

Much of the interest in brain stimulation stems from findings linking antisocial or impulsive behavior to dysfunction in the prefrontal cortex, the region of the brain responsible for executive control, emotional regulation, and judgment. Laboratory studies suggest that stimulating this area can temporarily enhance self control or reduce aggressive responses in controlled settings. These findings have led some commentators to speculate whether neurological interventions could someday complement traditional crime-prevention strategies.

Continue reading

by

During the week ending October 31, 2025 we have received listings of 12 Government and Administrative Law Summaries,  22 Constitutional Law summaries,  36 Criminal Law Summaries, 1 White Collar Law Summary,  2 Intellectual Property Summaries, and 1 Medical Malpractice Summary.   We plan is to continue posting opinion summaries, under corresponding areas of law, weekly whenever possible in order to keep blog readers updated.  To gain access to these case summaries, click on the corresponding links below:

Opinion Summaries Posted for Week Ending  October 31, 2025:

Criminal Law

Continue reading

by

INTRODUCTION:

Antifa is a decentralized, far left political movement that participates in protests and counter-protests, with some individuals engaging in criminal and violent acts. While specific incidents of violence have been attributed to individuals identifying with the movement, analysts and law enforcement agencies note that the most significant and lethal threat of domestic terrorism in the U.S. has historically come from right-wing and white supremacist extremists. 

WHAT IS ANTIFA AND ITS ORIGIONS?

Continue reading

by

Article from the American Bar Association, Criminal Justice Section:*

INTRODUCTION:

“As widely reported, the U.S. Department of Justice’s updated FCPA guidelines, released June 9, mark a high-profile strategic shift in enforcement priorities. Most of the law firm commentary has focused on internal compliance and investigation.  The overall take-away is that the FCPA enforcement under the Administration may not be as dead as initially thought.

Continue reading

by

In their provocative and urgent reflection, Austin Sarat and Steve Kramer confront what they view as one of the most dire questions for America today: what happens the spectacle of a public assassination becomes another battleground for opinion and outrage? In “After the Death of Charlie Kirk, America Needs to Take a Pause,” they examine the violent death of the conservative activist Charlie Kirk not merely as an isolated tragedy, but as a moment pregnant with national significance. Drawing on historical analogies, social media analysis, and a hard-eyed reading of our polarized public sphere, they call on Americans to resist the accelerating drift from deliberation to reaction, from democracy to demonization.

Sarat, a scholar of jurisprudence and political life, and Kramer, a seasoned legal practitioner, bring complementary lenses to this inquiry. For them, the more pressing danger is not just that a life was lost, but that the social response,  rushed judgments, political exploitation, binary narratives,  may deepen fractures in a democracy already saturated with distrust. Their central claim is if we fail to slow down, to “take a pause,” we risk letting the crowd, and the algorithm, decide not only the meaning of death but the future of public life. In their posting in JUSTIA/VERDICT,  Sarat and Kramer unpack the patterns of reaction, the structural forces amplifying them, and the modest but essential act of collective restraint they urge in response.

To see Sarat and Kramer’s complete posting in JUSTIA/VERDICT, click here.

Continue reading

by

Executive Summary

This article examines whether the Supreme Court’s current standards for determining competence to be executed adequately protect individuals with severe cognitive impairments and mental illnesses. While landmark decisions , Ford v. Wainwright (1986), Panetti v. Quarterman (2007), and Madison v. Alabama (2019) , established that a person must possess a rational understanding of the connection between their crime and punishment, critics argue the framework remains unclear, inconsistently applied, and insufficiently protective.

The case of Ralph Menzies, a Utah death row inmate suffering from vascular dementia, illustrates these concerns. Despite serious cognitive decline and an inability to comprehend his punishment, Utah continues to pursue his execution. The Court’s standard leaves wide discretion to the states, creating procedural disparities, frequent “battles of the experts,” and significant hurdles for inmates, who bear the burden of proving their own incompetence.

Continue reading
Contact Information
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2016 – 2026, David Badertscher
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design