Inspired by Axios’s “Behind the Curtain: A White-Collar Bloodbath” (May 28, 2025)
Dario Amodei, cofounder and CEO of Anthropic, is issuing an urgent warning: advanced artificial intelligence may soon pose a serious threat to millions of white-collar jobs. While today’s AI systems, like Anthropic’s own Claude and OpenAI’s ChatGPT, are currently seen as productivity boosters, Amodei cautions that this could quickly change as models become dramatically more powerful.
In internal presentations recently shared with government officials, Amodei projected that future AI models, potentially arriving in the early 2030s, could be capable of performing 80 to 90% of tasks typically handled by college educated professionals. These include jobs in legal research, finance, marketing, and customer service. For example, AI tools are already being deployed to automate paralegal tasks and financial analysis; and some early adopter companies are replacing portions of their human customer support teams with large language model (LLM) chatbots.
These concerns aren’t just hypothetical. Anthropic’s own forecasting suggests that without meaningful intervention, future models could lead to what the company has called a “white-collar bloodbath,” reshaping employment in the professional services sector on a scale not seen since the Industrial Revolution.
One field facing both disruption and opportunity is law librarianship. Traditionally seen as the gatekeepers of legal information, law librarians are already witnessing a shift as AI tools increasingly take on roles in legal research, document summarization, and information retrieval. Systems powered by LLMs can scan and analyze large volumes of case law, statutes, and regulations in seconds, tasks that once took hours of careful human curation. While this may increase efficiency, it also raises concerns about the devaluation of specialized human judgment and the long term stability of information-based roles.
However, many in the legal information community see AI not as a replacement but as an enhancement to the profession. Law librarians can serve as critical intermediaries who evaluate, implement, and oversee AI systems to ensure accuracy, mitigate bias, and protect against overreliance. As these technologies evolve, the role of the law librarian may shift from “finder of facts” to “manager of machines”, shaping ethical research frameworks, training users, and preserving human oversight in a rapidly automating legal ecosystem.
Amadi is hardly hopeless. He sees a variety of ways to help prevent the worst case employment scenarios, and has proposed a forward-looking policy idea: a “token tax.” This would place a small levy on each digital token, or unit of language, processed by powerful AI models. Since large scale deployments of AI involve billions of tokens per day, even a modest tax could raise significant revenue. The funds could then be used to finance job retraining programs, education initiatives, or broader social safety nets such as universal basic income.
Reuven S. Avi Yonah, Professor of Law and Director of the international tax LLM Program at the University of Michigan has concerns that align closely with those of Amodei. He believes that incentives created through taxation could play invaluable roles in limiting “hallucinations,” copyright infringement, and other problems connected to AI. For a discussion of his proposals in detail see his article, Can Tax Policy Help Us Control Artificial intelligence, in the Summer 2025 issue of the Marquette Lawyer. He would like to see a targeted policy that taxes only the AI program and not the corporation per se.
“We need to think now about how to manage a world where AI can do a majority of economically valuable tasks,” Amodei said. “The disruption will be profound if we’re not prepared.”
Amodei’s message aligns with growing calls from within the tech sector for anticipatory regulation. But so far, few concrete policies have emerged at the federal level. As companies race to develop ever more capable AI systems, the clock is ticking on the opportunity to shape a humane and equitable transition for law librarians and many others navigating the shifting landscape of white collar work.
Further Reading:
- Reuven S. Avi-Yonah, Can Tax Policy Help Us Control Artificial Intelligence?, Marq. Law., Summer 2025, at 18.
This article is an edited transcript of Professor Avi-Yonah’s Robert F. Boden Lecture delivered at Marquette University Law School on September 26, 2024. It explores how taxation could serve as a regulatory tool to address challenges posed by artificial intelligence, such as misinformation and copyright infringement. YouTube+7Marquette Today+7Marquette Today+7Marquette University Law School+3Marquette Today+3Marquette University Law School+3
Additionally, a more detailed scholarly article coauthored by Professor Avi-Yonah with Lucas Brasil Salama, Herbert Snitz, and Will Thomas is scheduled for publication in the Summer 2025 issue of the Marquette Law Review. Marquette University Law School+4Marquette Today+4Marquette University Law School+4
- Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Law Libraries (Mid Atlantic Round table Report, October 13, 2023)
-
Legal Research Tools in the Age of Generative AI (ABA Journal, March 25, 2024)